Abstract : To be able to speak seriously about interreligious dialogue, we must first clarify what is meant by religion. It is necessary to distinguish \u201creligious tradition\u201d, \u201creligious institution\u201d and \u201creligiosity\u201d. It is also important to reflect on people in dialogue, in this case theologians in the majority of cases. What do they represent? Their own opinion? The point of view of the institution to which they belong? Is it a consensus among theologians? It must be recognized that there are many and different kinds of dialogue. The article identifies three standard examples. First, two Christian theologians who seek to give a place to Islam within the framework of their own theology. Then, two theologians, one Christian and the other Muslim, who reflect on the place to give to believers of another religion in their theology. Finally, a person who studies the point of view of several theologians, two Christians and two Muslims, and points out the points of convergence and divergence, sometimes even within the same religious tradition. To conclude: any form of interreligious dialogue presupposes a culture of dialogue that is first and foremost based on good human relations. Training to foster such a culture exists and must follow different steps. The author presents an example of this kind of training.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":9632,"template":"","class_list":["post-9883","article","type-article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"date_tournage":"","yoast_head":"\n