Hosted by

Pluriel

Initiated by

Pluriel

Supported by

Pluriel

Research Group

See all Research Groups

Theology of Prophecy in Dialogue (Paderborn)

A Jewish-Christian-Muslim Encounter

The Qur’anic approach to prophecy challenges Jewish and Christian perspectives for a variety of reasons. The Qur’an seems to have some concrete features of prophets in mind that are not completely coherent with the Biblical tradition. Moreover, it is the selection of prophets within the Qur’an that is idiosyncratic and confusing from Jewish and Christian perspectives. For example, important prophets, such as Isaiah and Jeremiah, do not appear by name in the Qurʾan but Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, considered as patriarchs in the Bible, are named prophets in the Qur´an.

The selection of the prophets in the Qur’an might be explained by considering the Qur’anic dialogue with Rabbinic literature and with the Syriac Mêmrê, especially from Jacob of Sarug. The Qur’an is obviously deeply intertwined in interreligious debates in late antiquity. Hence, one basic aim of our project will be to promote a historically situated understanding of Qur’anic prophetology. This includes not only textual elements of the Qur’anic proclamation but the contextualization of the prophetic figure of Muhammad within the wider political and religious developments of late antiquity.

Even with a better historical understanding of the development of Qur’anic ideas, Christianity is still confronted with the challenge of the content of the Qur’an’s account of prophetology. The Qur’an seems to react to the typological readings of the prophetic figures in the preaching of the church fathers and to establish prophetology as a kind of counter-discourse to Christology. Today many Christians know that the typological reading of the prophetic literature can easily be understood in a supersessionist way. If Muslims present the Qur’anic way of reading the prophetic tradition in non-supersessionist modes, Christians might be inspired by this to reframe their typological interpretations.

There is currently no systematic theological attempt in Christianity to develop a prophetology that takes account of the proprium of Christian theology alongside the insights of Israel-theology on the intrinsic value of prophecy. A Christian prophetology should broaden the Christian view of Jesus Christ even if Jesus is the fulfilment of all humanity and prophecy. As conditional beings, humans will never come to an end with the recognition of the unconditional. If Jews articulate why they challenge the Christian reading of Christ as fulfilment of the prophetic figures of the Bible, Christians might be able to learn from these interventions to rebuild Christology in a non-supersessionist way. Conversely, Muslims might learn from the Jewish and Christian understandings of the prophetic tradition how to understand their own tradition as a constructive partner within a discourse with Judaism and Christianity.

This research project is an activity of the “Centre of Comparative Theology and Cultural Studies” (ZeKK) of the University of Paderborn.
Project duration : 2020 – 2023

Members of the group (under construction) : Klaus von Stosch, Zishan Ghaffar, Muna Tatari, Elisa Klapheck, Cordula Heupts, Mohammad Haghani Fazl, Nadia Saad, Elizaveta Dorogova

Affiliation institution(s)

Group leader(s)

Group members

Zishan Ahmad Ghaffar

Professor of Quranic exegesis at the Islamic Theological Seminary of the University of Paderborn.

Muna Tatari

Professor for Islamic Theology - University of Paderborn.

Klaus von Stosch

Professor for Catholic Theology, and researcher about comparative theology as guide in the world of religions - University of Paderborn.

Related news